Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 342.5

Year, Volume, Number:
2024, Vol. 12, № 4 (48)

Pages: 42-52

PUBLIC-LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN BIOMEDICINE: THE EXPERIENCE OF FRANCE

Georgy B. Romanovsky
Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya street, Penza, 440026, Russia, up406@mail.ru

EDN: IDAVWK
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-4-5

Category: PUBLIC LEGAL (STATE LEGAL) SCIENCES

For citation:
Romanovsky G.B. Public-legal foundations of modern biomedicine: the experience of France. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2024;12(4):42–52. (In Russ.). doi:10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-4-5

...................................

Received: 10.09.2024

Accepted: 30.10.2024
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. Modern biomedicine is rapidly developing all over the world. The changes that are taking place determine new approaches to regulating individual issues of public health. This thesis is also applicable to Russian legislation, the transformation of which is impossible without taking into account foreign experience. The main objective is to define the legal basis for regulating public relations in the field of biomedicine, relying on foreign experience. The French legal system is chosen as an illustrative example. Materials and methods. The empirical basis of the study was formed by the normative acts of France, namely the Laws on Bioethics, as well as other legal sources that determine approaches to regulating biomedical technologies. In connection with the comparative focus of the study, the main method is comparative legal, which allowed us to project foreign experience onto Russian legal reality. Results. The article presents a general description of the French legislation in the field of biomedicine. The dynamics of the adoption of laws on bioethics are shown, the main provisions of the said laws in the field of transplantology, reproductive medicine, genomic medicine are disclosed. The experience of the functioning of the National Advisory Ethics Committee for Life and Health Sciences is considered. Recommendations for improving Russian legislation are presented. Conclusions. France became the first country to clearly introduce the concept of bioethics into legal circulation, using it in the title of an official law. The key provisions of legislative acts in the field of biomedicine are highlighted, which can be used to improve the Russian legal system. Attention is drawn to the block of legal norms devoted to genomic medicine and reproductive medicine.

Keywords
regulation, bioethics, biomedicine, genomic medicine, assisted reproductive technologies, France

References
1. Bondar N.S., Amelin R.V., Artemova D.I., Velieva D.S. et al. Ekonomicheskoe pravo: uchebnik = Economic law: textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021:352. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31085/9785392336791-2021-352
2. Averyanova N.N., Velieva D.S., Kapitonova E.A. et al. Prava cheloveka i bezopasnost v sov-remennom mire: gibridnye ugrozy i novye vyzovy = Human rights and security in the modern world: Hybrid threats and new challenges. Moscow, 2023:152. (In Russ.)
3. Potter V.R. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice-Hall, Cop., 1971;XVII:205.
4. Bryukhina E.R., Tret'yakova E.S. Theoretical and legal basis for bioethics and biolaw in their interrelation and interaction. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald: Juridical Sciences. 2023;(62):568–589. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17072/1995-4190-2023-62-568-589
5. Kravets I.A. Anthropological bioconstitutionalism and constitutional bioethics: prospects for constitutional development of biodiversity and constitutional reform in 2020. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2022;(5):11–15. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3767-2022-5-11-15
6. Krylatova I.Yu. The constitutional category of human dignity in the relationship between the moral foundations of everyday life and medicine. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2022;(8):5–40. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3767-2022-8-35-40
7. Mokhov A.A. The role of biolaw and bioethics in biopolitics. Yurist = Lawyer. 2022;(1):16–21. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3929-2022-1-16-21
8. Voronina I.A., Savoshchikova E.V., Sablin D.A. Integration of biomedicine and bioethics into the legal space as a basis for the protection and defense of citizens' rights to health and medical care. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2018;(9):67–70. (In Russ.)
9. Romanovskaya O.V. Responsibilities of medical organizations. Menedzher zdravookhraneniya = Healthcare Manager. 2014;(5):43–51. (In Russ.)
10. Posadkova M.V. The future is here: on the constitutional nature of the reproductive right to have a child with assisted technologies. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative constitutional review. 2022;(6):72–94. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21128/1812-7126-2022-6-72-94
11. Aleynikova V.V. Current issues of law enforcement practice in the field of assisted reproductive technologies. Zakon = Law. 2022;(6):126–138. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37239/0869-4400-2022-19-6-126-138
12. Camby C. Les actions de l'Agence de la biomédecine dans le domaine de l'assistance médicale à la procreation. Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine. 2008;192(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4079(19)32857-2
13. Dyuka A. Topical issues of French legislation in the field of legal regulation of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Reproduktivnaya meditsina = Reproductive medicine. 2020;(2):17–21. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37800/RM2020-1-11
14. Romanovskiy G.B. Pravovoe regulirovanie vspomogatel'nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologiy (na primere surrogatnogo materinstva): monografiya = Legal regulation of assisted reproductive technologies (using surrogacy as an example): monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2011. (In Russ.)
15. Bogdan V.V., Urda M.N. Surrogacy & human trafficking: an inter-sectoral conflict. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald: Juridical Sciences. 2022;(58):628–657. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-628-657
16. Blasco S., Galbis E.M., Tanguy J. Social ties and the influence of public policies on individual opinions: The case of same-sex marriage laws. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2022;38(1):196–271. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewab001
17. Barrangou M. Mariage pour tous dans la presse: itinéraire d’une nomination (2012–2013). Mots. Les langages du politique. 2018;116:75–90. doi: 10.4000/mots.23066
18. Mathieu S. Catholic voice and ART: revising the French bioethics law. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online. 2020;11:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.11.001
19. Aleynikova V.V. Civil status of embryos: in search of a balance of interests. Zakon = Law. 2022;(12):46–65. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37239/0869-4400-2022-19-12-46-65
20. Kravets I.A. Constitutional biojurisprudence and the achievement of bioethical well-being (Part 2). Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative constitutional review. 2022;(3):16–32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21128/1812-7126-2022-3-16-32

Дата создания: 26.11.2024 18:57
Дата обновления: 30.11.2024 18:56